As discussed previously, online platforms of news and information will forever be at the centre of heavy debate regarding their legitimacy as outlets for journalism. Facebook, Twitter and Blogger have been widely criticised by some media professionals as de-legitimising real expertise.
![]() |
| ?? |
News and information can be published online through individuals blogs websites and other forums and is more often than not unmonitored and uncensored.
Of course there can be downfalls to this extreme open forum that is the internet. At what point do we separate the real journalism from the fake journalism?
Is there such a thing as fake journalism?
Of course there is if we are talking about people making up news and information and putting it online as if it were true, which I daresay does take place a little too often. My motto when crusin’ the news streams is triple check your info.
But aside from fake news posts, which usually give themselves away by the holes in the stories so gaping that words slip through them off the page, on a whole the more people that are discussing and sharing online, the richer and more in-depth the online news community becomes.
But aside from fake news posts, which usually give themselves away by the holes in the stories so gaping that words slip through them off the page, on a whole the more people that are discussing and sharing online, the richer and more in-depth the online news community becomes.
Some of the first places that news stories break are now on online social media outlets. The online editor of the Courier Mail John Grey told a few weeks ago that news organisations regularly elect to use images taken by citizen journalists on hand held and personal devices that have been emailed or uploaded over the media photographers’ images.
Quite often images taken by those who experienced the event capture the true sense of feeling present when news stories break. As the 9/11 anniversary approaches us I will refer back to it as a prime example of citizen journalism.
![]() |
| Citizen photography 9/11 |
Online social media is increasing the volume of news sharing and evaluating, thus altering the publics relationship to news and information. Networking environments are forging a kind of creative connectivity between users who are accessing new information and resources. Networking provides more conversation and diversifies the audience, fueling ideas and information.
Hurricane Irene hit The East coast just last night, and thanks to Twitter, though the disaster was taking place so many thousand kilometres away from my home and in a completely different time zone, I was able to stay up to date with her movements and even watched a live video streaming from a building in Manhattan.
Similarly, online feeds and blogs are creating more channels of conversation and outlets for wider viewpoints. The media’s take may be seen on TV and in the papers, but broader discussion on certain topics can be had online which in my opinion, is much more beneficial to consumers than hearing a one sided version.
When three Channel 9 juniors were sacked after the hoax helicopter crosses, I instantly wanted to know what some of the reasons may have been. A quick shout out on Facebook to members one of my personal groups and I had links to news sites and much more information from individuals and their thoughts than I originally did.
Social outlets enable news of events and valid viewpoints to be shared in a simple and readily accessible way. Social media provides the user with a faster and often diplomatic outlet of media production and consumption.
Journalists and other media professionals can also learn through social media . By accessing these online networks that local and other related groups do, they can gain a greater understanding of the interests and beliefs of the interconnected communities around them.







